-
The Tournament is complete. Long Island won
the Gold medal with an undefeated record. Western
took the Silver medal with a big win over Hudson
Valley who took the bronze. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central clearly did well in offense and so their problems in the tournament occurred elsewhere. Their offense played better team ball than the rest of the field, scoring a larger number of assisted goals, while still producing nearly as many goals as Western. Central’s leading scorers Boltus, Lococo, Venditti and While were all assisted in more than half of their goals and in fact, Boltus and Venditti in the attack had 11 of their combined 16 goals assisted while beating the opponent goalies on those shots on 91% and 86% (respectively). Hudson Valley looked good in assisted goals. Kevin Stockel led the effort with 9 goals, all of which were assisted (4 from John Jay teammate Chris Bocklet) and by Brian Douglass (also from John Jay) who scored 8g (6 assisted). The volume of shots, however were only half the number taken by Long Island and nearly a third less than Central. Ground ball production is often an indicator of success and although the numbers fall within a close range, the stats show a slight edge to Long Island and Western. Performance (Defense): On the defensive end of the field, Long Island, once again is the statistical gold medal winner in nearly every stat. The Island allowed substantially fewer goals, and with 26 goals against, had less then half the number as the bottom three teams. The combined goalie average for the Long Island placed them third, but the order of magnitude was not great. Western’s Wickham ended the tournament at 56% whereas Long Island star, Adam Ghitelman had a 52%, but Wickham faced nearly twice as many shots (90 vs 42). The four top teams were all in roughly the same statistical area. Central, as demonstrated in the chart, was clearly not in the top three from a defensive standpoint. There was a dramatic difference in the goals against average, which was greatly influenced by the Long Island game’s 18 goals against, but Central allowed both Hudson Valley and New York City to take them to double figures. In every case Central’s performance was significantly lower then Long Island or Western and more closely resembled the Valley’s. The defense allowed substantially more shots on the Central goalies who saved just over 50% but looked similar to the goalies from the top three teams. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special Teams: The Man up data is significant as each team had roughly the same number of extra man opportunities (22 for ADK, but the rest had between 27 and 33). New York City had the best average (39%) with 11 goals on 28 tries. Except for their Long Island game where they were 0 for 2, they scored at least two goals per game in man up and had 4 for 6 against Central in their last game of the tournament. Long Island was exceptional in the man down efforts, turning away 93% of the opportunities and having perfect games against Western (8-8), New York City (2-2) and Adirondack (5-5) while allowing only one man up goal against Central and Hudson Valley. Central allowed 16 man up goals while Hudson Valley allowed 8 and New York City allowed only 4. Long Island and Western were substantially more successful with face offs, and they did it two different ways. The Island found success using Stephen Bentz (39 for 55 = 71%) with teammate Al Kohart (27 for 44 = 61%), while Western used Carter Bloor (58 for 92 = 63%). Central used three players and was hampered by their lack of possession as they tried Amidon (47%), Desko (38%) and Doldo (58%) but could not establish the performance that was expected before the games began. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conclusions: There are relatively few issues that need addressing relative to the 2006 ESG Lacrosse games. First Long Island clearly won and was dominant in many areas, with the most important being wins. Their undefeated record speaks for itself. There were moments in games when they did not live up to their impressive credentials, but in the end they took home the gold. A second question relates to Western’s finish. Did they “luck into” the silver? From their opening game with Long Island, Western’s “keep it tough” defense made Coach Hobart’s statement that Western would play a very physical game. Manley and Palmer were particularly aggressive in front of the cage and although they each earned 5 penalties, their behavior kept a number of opponents from wanting to venture into shooting range. Both of them ended with 6 take aways (2nd place on the leader board). Fairport’s Mike Danylyshyn who tied for 4th in tournament scoring and tied for first in tournament assists (10g-8a) was a surprise “Top Performer”. His 18 points combined with Catalino’s 21 points accounted for more than a quarter of the Western offense. Dom Scalzo (Webster Thomas) also made a statement with his eight goals. Carter Bloor (Corning East) took a staggering 92 face offs (all but 11), and was the top dog on the leader board with 59 wins (64%). Inoffense, defense and face offs, Western demonstrated that they earned the silver medal. Hudson Valley played their most exciting game on Friday morning, when they took a 5-1 halftime lead and never looked back in their 10-6 win over Central. They had a shot at the silver in the last game of the tournament, but Western, knowing that they needed to win by three goals, did not let the Valley get close. Although the Valley clearly beat Central, they were certainly helped by Central’s game against Long Island, as before Saturday’s games, the “goals against” for Western and Central were tied at 23 and Hudson Valley was at 22. After Saturday’s games, Western was two behind the Valley and Central was out of it (11 goals behind Western). Finally, what happened to Central? There is no doubt that Central had a talented list of players and Coach Scott is a proven leader. Defensive problems and an inability to win face offs hurt Central. They lost a critical game to Hudson Valley in a downpour on Friday morning and after losing in a blowout to Long Island (18-6) on Saturday they nearly lost to New York City on Sunday morning (13-12 in overtime). Central did beat Western on double header Friday (10-9) but the 18 point loss to the Island put them out of medal contention. Central has finished out of the medals only six times since the ESG added men’s lacrosse in 1984. They team simply did not “jell” as the Central team and fans had hoped. It happens. As for the medal, their performance did not warrant a bronze, but there is the possibility that Long Island understood the tie breaking procedure and wished to take Central out of contention. Given the long rivalry between the Island and Central, it is possible that Long Island added a few goals to help influence the tie breaking outcome. Before the game Central, Western and Hudson Valley were all with one goal (in goals against). In the Long Island Central game, there were two stops for lightning. If the game had ended at halftime, the goals against would have been 6 goals and Central would have been right in the mix with Central and HV. Long Island scored 6 unanswered goals in 4th quarter ending Central’s chances and perhaps taking “will to win” away from them for Sunday’s overtime game against New York City. Finally, it is worth noting the accomplishments of the New York City team. The City, who won their first game last year when they came back from a 7-3 deficit to beat Adirondack 8-7, beat them again this year, this time with a score of 12-7. As exciting as was that win, on Sunday morning they nearly defeated Central, as they scored two goals at the end of regulation to force the game into overtime. Central won 13-12. Fieldston midfielder Phil Dimin placed 3rd on the tournament leader board for goals (11g-2a) while Max Vanboargondien (Lawrenceville) placed 5th in points with 14 (9g-5a). New York City has struggled over the years to produce a team and each year is the team “that gets no respect”. It is worth noting that this year’s team made great strides and gives the City fans a great deal about which to be proud. That ends the review of the 2006 Empire State Lacrosse games. It was, as usual, an exciting time for the players, coaches and fans and well worth the effort that the New York State Office of Parks and Recreation puts into this annual extravaganza. Well done. To
see all of the ESG reports and stories, click here. |